Slorginvader (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Dennis Kucinich

N1GWANNNAC1G (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

whos the guy name that answered the question

hannamanna (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

heart heart G

saxmanchiro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Your attacking the messenger. WWF report is the culprit.

markbotv3 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

LOL what? it was 5 billion in 1980 6 billion in 1994 and now its 7.1 billion...9.5 in 2100? your out of your freakin mind!!!! if every child bearing woman had only one baby the pop would double in four years. not to mention 2 4 or 6 babys...you must have a seriously pesamistic view of the future my friend.

saxmanchiro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

mark Check out WWF- "Living Planet Report-06" They have three scenarios plotted with range of 8.9 bill in 2050 to 9.5 in 2100. They have a very well done piece of pop. biology in their report. Ecological footprint for humans is not looking good. Check it out

markbotv3 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

the only factor for population max isnt land its food distribution. humans dont take up that much space but the ability to distribute food determins max cap. as food technology increases and distribution nodes so will population. in industrial nations children are seen as i financial burden so growth is going down but in most thirdworld nations children are seen as financial boons.

markbotv3 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

its not that high...where did you get your number? we will be at 9 billion in 4 years. 18 billion in 20 years

saxmanchiro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

mark Where did they get their info from? The number is out there in the stratosphere and somewhat, IMO, high. Paper/journal ??

markbotv3 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Future Farmers of America...who should know more about population caps then the people who Controll the population?